Discussion about this post

User's avatar
TimeTexas's avatar

Not sure if you're talking about watches or politics, but this fits our current political climate and discourse in the US quite well.

Put me on team Ancienne. Homages are lazy profit grabs.

Finally, this:

This is also why reading and writing tend to be the most compelling medium to alter our beliefs. The environment is non-confrontational, non-threatening, and allows for people to take time to think about concepts. In conversation, people have to worry about their status and appearance… they must ensure they do not embarrass themselves, and of course, when faced with an audience they will be inclined to double-down on a particular view to avoid looking weak.

This is why social media is such a terrible platform for communication. It takes written communication (our most effective and compelling means of communication as you correctly point out) and takes away the thoughtful consideration and reduces it to reactionary bullshit, status seeking, and virtual high fives.

F me.

Great article🫸🫷

Expand full comment
QuickReviews's avatar

We collaborate so well, that we start to lose sight of where our own understanding ends, and others’ understanding begins.

My favourite qoute from this article.

Fantastic read, Well done 👏

Your refrence to Hublot was a fantastic example, I found myself actually liking th fusion classic in blue from an aesthetic point of view, I really think its a good looking watch.

Would i buy it? No, and 9/10 reasons is because the watch community generally hates it and it would make me feel a type of way wearing it. Like a outcast.

Yet I actually like it.

That scenario fits very well to this thread that I thoroughly enjoyed reading.

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts